Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer
Página inicial / Neil Gorsuch Was Recently Appointed to Fill What Federal Position? *

Neil Gorsuch Was Recently Appointed to Fill What Federal Position? *

Postar um comentário

United states Supreme Courtroom nomination

President Donald Trump with Guess Neil Gorsuch and his wife Louise, during the announcement at the White House.

On January 31, 2017, soon after taking office, President Donald Trump, a Republican, nominated Neil Gorsuch for Associate Justice of the Supreme Courtroom of the Us to succeed Antonin Scalia, who had died almost i year earlier. And then-president Barack Obama, a Democrat, nominated Merrick Garland to succeed Scalia on March sixteen, 2016, but the Republican-controlled U.S. Senate did not vote on the nomination. Majority leader Mitch McConnell declared that as the presidential election bike had already commenced, information technology made the date of the next justice a political issue to be decided by voters. The Senate Judiciary Commission refused to consider the Garland nomination, thus keeping the vacancy open through the end of Obama's presidency on January xx, 2017.

When nominated, Gorsuch was a sitting gauge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Excursion, a position to which he had been appointed by President George W. Bush-league in 2006. Democratic Senators launched a delay confronting Gorsuch's nomination, hoping to cake his confirmation. Nevertheless, Republicans invoked the "nuclear selection", eliminating the delay with respect to Supreme Courtroom nominees.[1] The Senate ultimately confirmed Gorsuch's nomination to the Supreme Court by a 54–45 vote on April 7, 2017 (all Republicans plus iii Democrats voted in his favor). Ten days after winning confirmation, Apr 17, Gorsuch heard his first case as the 101st acquaintance justice of the Courtroom.[2]

Groundwork [edit]

On February 13, 2016, Associate Justice Antonin Scalia died unexpectedly.[3] [4] His decease triggered a protracted political battle that did non stop until the Senate confirmed Gorsuch's nomination in Apr 2017.

Political commentators at the time widely recognized Scalia as one of the virtually conservative members of the Court, and noted that President Barack Obama had an opportunity to name a more than liberal replacement, a motion that could alter the Court'due south ideological residuum for many years into the future.[5] The president ultimately nominated Merrick Garland on March 16, 2016. His confirmation would have given Democratic appointees a bulk on the Supreme Court for the first time since the 1970s.[vi] Republican Senate leaders, citing the fact that the vacancy arose during Obama's concluding twelvemonth equally president, declared that the Senate would non even consider a nomination from the president.[7]

Garland'south nomination expired on Jan 3, 2017, with the end of the 114th Congress, 293 days after it had been submitted to the Senate.[7] As a result of the nomination's defeat, Scalia's seat remained vacant until after Donald Trump'south January 20, 2017 presidential inauguration.[7] Only the 15th time in U.Southward. Senate history that a Supreme Court nomination had lapsed at the end of a session of Congress,[8] many Democrats reacted angrily to the Senate's refusal to consider Garland, with Senator Jeff Merkley describing the vacant seat every bit a "stolen seat".[9] However, Republicans such as Senator Chuck Grassley argued that the Senate was within its rights to refuse to consider a nominee until the inauguration of a new president.[10]

Nomination [edit]

Potential candidates [edit]

During the 2016 presidential entrada, while Garland remained before the Senate, Trump released 2 lists of potential nominees. On May 18, 2016, Trump released a brusque listing of eleven judges for nomination to the Scalia vacancy.[11] In September 2016, Trump released a 2nd listing of x possible nominees, this time including 3 minorities.[12] Both lists were assembled by the Federalist Club and the Heritage Foundation.[13] Leonard Leo of the Federalist Society played a major part in the creation of the second list, which included Gorsuch.[xiv] [15]

After winning the presidential election, Trump and White Firm Counsel Don McGahn interviewed 4 individuals for the Supreme Courtroom opening, all of whom had appeared on one of the two previously-released lists.[xiii] The iv individuals were federal appellate judges Tom Hardiman, Bill Pryor and Neil Gorsuch, as well as federal district judge Amul Thapar.[13] All iv had been appointed to the federal bench past President George W. Bush. While Pryor had been seen by many as the early on front end-runner due to the backing of Attorney Full general Jeff Sessions, many evangelicals expressed resistance to him, and the concluding decision ultimately came downward to Gorsuch or Hardiman.[13] Hardiman had the support of Trump's sister, Judge Maryanne Trump Barry,[xiii] but Trump instead chose to nominate Gorsuch.[16]

Announcement [edit]

President Trump announced the nomination of Gorsuch on January 31, 2017. The nomination was formally received past the Senate on February 1, 2017, and was subsequently referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee.[8] At the time of his nomination, Gorsuch was described as solidly conservative, merely probable to be confirmed without much difficulty.[17] [18] [19] Richard Primus of Political leader described Gorsuch as "Scalia 2.0" due to ideological similarities,[20] and a study prepared past Lee Epstein, Andrew Martin, and Kevin Quinn predicted that Gorsuch would exist a "reliable conservative" similar to Scalia.[21]

Co-ordinate to The Washington Post, Trump talked nigh rescinding Gorsuch'south nomination, venting angrily to advisers after his Supreme Court pick was disquisitional of the president's escalating attacks on the federal judiciary in a private February coming together with Democratic legislators.[22]

Responses to the nomination [edit]

Neil Gorsuch with Senate Judiciary Commission Chairman Chuck Grassley, February 1, 2017

Norm Eisen, Special Counsel for Ideals and Government Reform in the White House and Ambassador to the Czechia, endorsed Gorsuch.[23] Eisen was a classmate of both Gorsuch and Obama at Harvard Law.[23] Neal Katyal, who served as Acting Solicitor General of the United States during the Obama Assistants and who is currently a law professor at Georgetown Academy Law Centre, endorsed Gorsuch for approval to the Supreme Court.[24]

The National Rifle Clan, the National Shooting Sports Foundation, the 2nd Subpoena Foundation and other gun rights groups endorsed Gorsuch,[25] [26] [27] while Americans for Responsible Solutions, the Law Eye to Prevent Gun Violence and other gun control proponents take opposed his nomination.[28] [29] House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi claimed Gorsuch "comes down on the side of felons over gun safety". PolitiFact called her statement misleading and said that Gorsuch's past rulings practise not "demonstrate that he thinks more felons should exist immune guns than what is already permitted under the constabulary".[xxx]

The American Civil Liberties Union raised concerns well-nigh Gorsuch's respect for disability rights.[31] The Secular Coalition for America, Freedom from Religion Foundation and Matrimony for Reform Judaism all voiced concerns with Gorsuch'due south nomination.[32]

The Judicial Crisis Network enthusiastically rallied behind Gorsuch later running a campaign against Merrick Garland, spending a full of $17 one thousand thousand to these ends.[33]

Confirmation hearing [edit]

Ticket for the March 2017 Neil Gorsuch Supreme Courtroom nomination hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee

Gorsuch'southward nomination was starting time considered by the Senate Judiciary Committee, which holds hearings on all federal judicial nominations and decides whether or not to send nominations to the total Senate for a terminal confirmation vote.[34] In the 115th Congress the commission consisted of xi Republicans and 9 Democrats, and was led by Republican Chuck Grassley. In preparation for the hearing, the committee requested the Department of Justice (DOJ) to send all documents they had regarding Gorsuch'southward work in the George Westward. Bush administration; and past the time the hearing commenced, the DOJ had sent the committee over 144,000 pages of documents and, according to a White House spokesman, more than 220,000 pages of documents altogether.[35] Gorsuch'due south confirmation hearing started on March xx, 2017, and lasted four days.[8] [36]

On the first day of hearings, March 20, senators largely used their opening statements to criticize each other, with Ranking Democrat Dianne Feinstein complaining of the "unprecedented treatment" of Judge Merrick Garland, while Democrat Michael Bennet felt "two wrongs don't make a right", with Republican Ted Cruz insisting President Trump'due south nomination at present carried "super-legitimacy".[37]

Autonomous senators repeatedly criticized Gorsuch for dissenting in a case where the Tenth Excursion Courtroom of Appeals ruled in favor of a truck driver who, subsequently waiting hours for relief, had finally abandoned his unheated truck and trailer in dangerously choppy conditions. Democrat Dick Durbin told Gorsuch the atmospheric condition was "not as common cold as your dissent".[37] Durbin also criticized the accuracy of his stance in the Hobby Antechamber case, where Gorsuch contended that contraception "destroys a fertilized egg," and that he had held the Religious Freedom Restoration Act included protection for corporations, rather than just individuals.[38]

In his own 16-minute opening statement, Gorsuch repeated his belief that a judge who likes all his rulings is "probably a pretty bad judge." He emphasized his decisions were based on "the facts at result in each detail case." He also noted that his all-encompassing record included many examples where he ruled both for and against disadvantaged groups.[36] [37]

On the second solar day of hearings, March 21, Gorsuch responded to questions by committee members. When Chairman Chuck Grassley asked Gorsuch if he would "take any trouble ruling against the president who appointed you", Gorsuch replied, no, and "that's a softball".[39] Ted Cruz used his time to enquire Gorsuch virtually The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, basketball, and mutton busting.[39] When asked by Republican Lindsey Graham how he would have reacted if during his interview at Trump Belfry the President had asked him to vote against Roe v. Wade, Gorsuch replied "I would accept walked out the door".[39]

Democratic senators continued to criticize Gorsuch on his dissent in the truck driver example, with Dianne Feinstein request him "will you be for the little men" and Democrat Al Franken telling the estimate his position was "absurd", going on to say "I had a career in identifying absurdity" (in reference to his former career equally a comedian).[39] Democrat Patrick Leahy used his time to praise Gauge Garland, criticize those policies of President George W. Bush that Gorsuch had defended at the Justice Department, and to inquire Gorsuch how he would rule in Washington v. Trump. He refused to comment on agile litigation, explained that Justice Department lawyers must defend their client, only did say that Garland is "an outstanding guess" and that Gorsuch e'er reads his opinions with "special intendance".[39]

On the 3rd twenty-four hour period of hearings, March 22, Gorsuch connected to reply commission members' questions. Republican Orrin Hatch asked Gorsuch if "you think your writings reflect a human knee-wiggle attitude against common-sense regulations", to which the judge replied "no".[twoscore] Democrat Sheldon Whitehouse spent the bulk of his allotted time describing to Gorsuch the negative furnishings of "Dark money" contributed by unknown donors. He also warned that the Court'south 2010 Citizens United ruling raises the risk that some factions could proceeds a monopoly of power and influence in the political sphere, and asked Gorsuch if would exist subject to "capture" past big concern, to which he replied "nobody will capture me".[41] [42]

During her allotted time, Democrat Amy Klobuchar pressed Gorsuch on what she viewed every bit his "selective originalism," observing that Gorsuch, who self-identifies as an originalist, had non consistently interpreted legal texts, including the Constitution, past the original public meaning that they would take had at the time that they became law.[41] Afterwards, when Dianne Feinstein asked him a question on the Equal Protection Clause, Gorsuch replied saying, "no 1 is looking to render us to horse and buggy days" and that "it matters not a whit that some of the drafters of the Fourteenth Amendment were racists. Because they were. Or sexists, because they were. The police force they drafted promises equal protection of the laws to all persons. That's what they wrote."[41]

That same solar day, the Supreme Court unanimously reversed the Tenth Circuit in an Individuals with Disabilities Education Act instance Gorsuch had not been involved in, although in 2008 he had written for a unanimous panel applying the same circuit precedent.[42] Still, Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer said this demonstrated "a connected, troubling pattern of Guess Gorsuch deciding against everyday Americans, even children who require special aid at schoolhouse".[41]

Gorsuch confirmation hearing witnesses
Date Proper name Role
March 20 Michael Bennet, Senator (D-CO) Introducer
Cory Gardner, Senator (R-CO) Introducer
Neal Katyal, former interim U.S. Solicitor General (May 2010 – June 2011) Introducer
March twenty
through
March 22 		Neil Gorsuch Nominee
March 23 Nancy Scott Degan, Chair, American Bar Association Continuing Committee on the Federal Judiciary Congressional witness
Shannon Edwards, Member, American Bar Association Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary Congressional witness
Deanell Reece Tacha, Pepperdine University School of Police Duane And Kelly Roberts Dean And Professor Of Law, U.S. Court Of Appeals Judge (Retired) Republican witness
Robert Harlan Henry, President of Oklahoma City Academy, U.South. Courtroom Of Appeals Approximate (Retired) Republican witness
John L. Kane Jr., United States federal judge, U.s.a. District Court for the District of Colorado Republican witness
Leah Bressack, quondam law clerk Republican witness
Elisa Massimino, President and CEO, Man Rights Commencement Autonomous witness
Jameel Jaffer, Executive Director, Columbia University/Knight Offset Amendment Institute Democratic witness
Jeff Perkins Democratic witness
Guerino J. Calemine, III, Full general Counsel, Advice Workers of America Autonomous witness
Jeff Lamken, Partner, MoloLamken Republican witness
Lawrence Solum, Carmack Waterhouse Professor Of Law, Georgetown University Law Center Republican witness
Jonathan Turley, J.B. And Maurice C. Shapiro Professor Of Public Involvement Law, The George Washington University Law Schoolhouse Republican witness
Karen Harned, Executive Director, National Federation Of Independent Business organization Small Business Legal Eye Republican witness
Heather McGhee, President, Demos Democratic witness
Fatima Goss Graves, Senior Vice President For Plan & President-Elect, National Women's Law Center Democratic witness
Patrick Gallagher, Director, Sierra Gild Environmental Constabulary Plan Autonomous witness
Eve Hill, Partner, Brown Goldstein Levy Democratic witness
Peter Kirsanow, Commissioner, U.S. Committee On Civil Rights; Partner, Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff Republican witness
Alice Fisher, Partner, Latham & Watkins Republican witness
Hannah Smith, Senior Counsel, Becket Fund Republican witness
Timothy Meyer, former police clerk Republican witness
Jamil N. Jaffer, one-time law clerk Republican witness
Kristen Clarke, President & CEO, Lawyers Committee For Ceremonious Rights Under Law Democratic witness
Sarah Warbelow, Legal Director, Human Rights Entrada Democratic witness
Amy Hagstrom Miller, President, CEO, & Founder, Whole Woman'due south Wellness Democratic witness
William Marshall, William Rand Kenan Jr. Distinguished Professor Of Law, University Of Northward Carolina Democratic witness
Sandy Phillips Autonomous witness

Plagiarism allegations [edit]

On April four, BuzzFeed and Politico ran articles highlighting similar language occurring in Gorsuch's book The Future of Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia and an earlier constabulary review article past Abigail Lawlis Kuzma, Indiana's deputy attorney general. Academic experts contacted by Pol "differed in their assessment of what Gorsuch did, ranging from calling it a clear impropriety to mere sloppiness".[43] [44] [45] [46]

John Finnis, who supervised Gorsuch'due south Oxford dissertation at Oxford stated, "The allegation is entirely without foundation. The book is meticulous in its commendation of main sources. The allegation that the book is guilty of plagiarism because information technology does non cite secondary sources which draw on those same primary sources is, bluntly, cool." Kuzma stated, "I have reviewed both passages and do non see an issue hither, fifty-fifty though the language is like. These passages are factual, not analytical in nature, framing both the technical legal and medical circumstances of the 'Baby/Infant Doe' case that occurred in 1982."[46] Noah Feldman, a Harvard Police force professor, thought that Gorsuch had committed "minor plagiarism", that deserved "no more punishment than the embarrassment attendant on its revelation".[47]

Senate votes [edit]

Judiciary Committee [edit]

On April three, 2017, the Senate Judiciary Committee endorsed the Gorsuch nomination, sending it to the full Senate for last activeness by an 11–9[8] political party-line vote, with all Republican members voting for him and all Democratic members voting confronting. The last time the committee's vote to approve a Supreme Court nominee split precisely along party lines was in 2006 on the Samuel Alito nomination.[48] [49] [50]

Filibuster [edit]

Gorsuch needed to win a simple majority vote of the full Senate (51 votes) to exist confirmed; however, a delay by the opposition would add together an boosted requirement, a three-fifths supermajority vote in favor of cloture (60 votes), which would let debate to end and force a concluding vote on confirmation. At the time, Republicans held 52 seats in the 100-seat Senate, and could too count on (if needed) the tie-breaking vote of Vice President Pence, acting in his Constitutional chapters as President of the Senate.[51] Subsequently nominating Gorsuch, President Trump chosen on the Senate to utilise the "nuclear pick" and abolish the filibuster for Supreme Courtroom appointments if its connected existence would foreclose Gorsuch'southward confirmation.[52] The nuclear pick was used in 2013 by then-Majority Leader Harry Reid to cancel filibusters for all presidential appointments except nominations to the Supreme Court.[fifty]

While some Republicans such equally John McCain expressed reluctance most abolishing the filibuster for executive appointments, others such equally John Cornyn argued that the Republican majority should reserve all options necessary to confirm Gorsuch.[51] Other political commentators accept proposed that that Senate Republican leadership prefer a strategic use of Standing Dominion Nineteen to avoid the elimination of the filibuster.[53] [54]

During the concluding solar day of committee hearings, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer announced that he would delay the nomination.[55] Autonomous opposition focused on complaints saying that Scalia's seat should have been filled by President Obama.[56] [57] In addition, Democrats Al Franken, Elizabeth Warren, and Kamala Harris, along with Independent Bernie Sanders each criticized various aspects of Gorsuch'due south tape. Additionally, Jeff Merkley said he would exercise "annihilation in his power"—including the ability of filibustering—to oppose Gorsuch's nomination.[58]

On Apr half dozen, 2017, Democrats launched a filibuster against Gorsuch's nomination. In response, Republicans invoked the nuclear option and changed the Senate rules to end filibusters for Supreme Court nominees. The move came after Democrats blocked the nomination under the previous rule, when merely four Democrats crossed-over and voted with Republicans for cloture: Michael Bennet, Joe Donnelly, Heidi Heitkamp and Joe Manchin.[59] After the rules change, a second cloture vote was held; this one, needing just a majority of Senators voting, passed, bringing debate to a close.[threescore] [61]

Total Senate [edit]

The Senate confirmed Neil Gorsuch to be an associate justice of the Supreme Courtroom on April vii, 2017, by a vote of 54–45.[8] All Republicans present, forth with Democrats Joe Manchin, Heidi Heitkamp and Joe Donnelly, voted to confirm him.[62] Republican Johnny Isakson, who had supported the nomination, was absent for the vote because he was recovering from back surgery.[63]

Vote to confirm the Gorsuch nomination
April 7, 2017 Party Total votes
Democratic Republican Independent
Yea three 51 0 54(54.55%)
Nay 43 0 2 45(45.45%)
Result: Confirmed
Ringlet call vote on the nomination
Senator Party State Vote
Lamar Alexander R Tennessee Yea
Tammy Baldwin D Wisconsin Nay
John Barrasso R Wyoming Yea
Michael Bennet D Colorado Nay
Richard Blumenthal D Connecticut Nay
Roy Edgeless R Missouri Yea
Cory Booker D New Bailiwick of jersey Nay
John Boozman R Arkansas Yea
Sherrod Chocolate-brown D Ohio Nay
Richard Burr R North Carolina Yea
Maria Cantwell D Washington Nay
Shelley Moore Capito R West Virginia Yea
Ben Cardin D Maryland Nay
Tom Carper D Delaware Nay
Bob Casey Jr. D Pennsylvania Nay
Pecker Cassidy R Louisiana Yea
Thad Cochran R Mississippi Yea
Susan Collins R Maine Yea
Chris Coons D Delaware Nay
Bob Corker R Tennessee Yea
John Cornyn R Texas Yea
Catherine Cortez Masto D Nevada Nay
Tom Cotton fiber R Arkansas Yea
Mike Crapo R Idaho Yea
Ted Cruz R Texas Yea
Steve Daines R Montana Yea
Joe Donnelly D Indiana Yea
Tammy Duckworth D Illinois Nay
Dick Durbin D Illinois Nay
Mike Enzi R Wyoming Yea
Joni Ernst R Iowa Yea
Dianne Feinstein D California Nay
Deb Fischer R Nebraska Yea
Jeff Bit R Arizona Yea
Al Franken D Minnesota Nay
Cory Gardner R Colorado Yea
Kirsten Gillibrand D New York Nay
Lindsey Graham R South Carolina Yea
Chuck Grassley R Iowa Yea
Kamala Harris D California Nay
Maggie Hassan D New Hampshire Nay
Orrin Hatch R Utah Yea
Martin Heinrich D New United mexican states Nay
Heidi Heitkamp D Northward Dakota Yea
Dean Heller R Nevada Yea
Mazie Hirono D Hawaii Nay
John Hoeven R North Dakota Yea
Jim Inhofe R Oklahoma Yea
Johnny Isakson R Georgia Absent
Ron Johnson R Wisconsin Yea
Tim Kaine D Virginia Nay
John Neely Kennedy R Louisiana Yea
Angus King I Maine Nay
Amy Klobuchar D Minnesota Nay
James Lankford R Oklahoma Yea
Patrick Leahy D Vermont Nay
Mike Lee R Utah Yea
Joe Manchin D West Virginia Yea
Ed Markey D Massachusetts Nay
John McCain R Arizona Yea
Claire McCaskill D Missouri Nay
Mitch McConnell R Kentucky Yea
Bob Menendez D New Bailiwick of jersey Nay
Jeff Merkley D Oregon Nay
Jerry Moran R Kansas Yea
Lisa Murkowski R Alaska Yea
Chris Murphy D Connecticut Nay
Patty Murray D Washington Nay
Bill Nelson D Florida Nay
Rand Paul R Kentucky Yea
David Perdue R Georgia Yea
Gary Peters D Michigan Nay
Rob Portman R Ohio Yea
Jack Reed D Rhode Island Nay
Jim Risch R Idaho Yea
Pat Roberts R Kansas Yea
Mike Rounds R S Dakota Yea
Marco Rubio R Florida Yea
Bernie Sanders I Vermont Nay
Ben Sasse R Nebraska Yea
Brian Schatz D Hawaii Nay
Chuck Schumer D New York Nay
Tim Scott R South Carolina Yea
Jeanne Shaheen D New Hampshire Nay
Richard Shelby R Alabama Yea
Debbie Stabenow D Michigan Nay
Luther Strange R Alabama Yea
Dan Sullivan R Alaska Yea
Jon Tester D Montana Nay
John Thune R South Dakota Yea
Thom Tillis R North Carolina Yea
Pat Toomey R Pennsylvania Yea
Tom Udall D New Mexico Nay
Chris Van Hollen D Maryland Nay
Marker Warner D Virginia Nay
Elizabeth Warren D Massachusetts Nay
Sheldon Whitehouse D Rhode Island Nay
Roger Wicker R Mississippi Yea
Ron Wyden D Oregon Nay
Todd Young R Indiana Yea
Source: [64]

On April ten, Gorsuch took the prescribed ramble and judicial (set by federal police) oaths of office, and became the 113th fellow member of the Supreme Court.[65] At age 49, he was the youngest person to join the Court since Clarence Thomas, at historic period 43, in 1991. Also, having been a law clerk for Anthony Kennedy (1993–94), he became the first Supreme Court justice to serve alongside a justice for whom he had previously clerked.[66]

See likewise [edit]

  • Demographics of the Supreme Court of the United States
  • Donald Trump Supreme Court candidates
  • Commencement 100 days of Donald Trump'south presidency
  • List of nominations to the Supreme Court of the United States

References [edit]

  1. ^ Killough, Ashley (April 7, 2017). "GOP triggers nuclear option on Neil Gorsuch nomination". CNN. Archived from the original on Apr 11, 2019. Retrieved April seven, 2017.
  2. ^ Liptak, Adam (April 17, 2017). "Bitter Fight Backside Him, Justice Gorsuch Starts Day With Enjoy". The New York Times. Archived from the original on April 18, 2017. Retrieved Apr 18, 2017.
  3. ^ Liptak, Alan (Feb xiii, 2016). "Justice Antonin Scalia, Who Led a Conservative Renaissance on the Supreme Court, Is Dead at 79". The New York Times. Archived from the original on February 18, 2016. Retrieved February eighteen, 2016.
  4. ^ Hennessy-Fiske, Molly (Feb 14, 2016). "Scalia'south last moments on a Texas ranch — quail hunting to being plant in 'perfect tranquility'". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on Feb eighteen, 2016. Retrieved February eighteen, 2016.
  5. ^ Helmore, Edward (February 14, 2016). "Republicans and Democrats draw battle lines over supreme court nomination". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on February 15, 2016. Retrieved Feb 15, 2016.
  6. ^ Chemerinsky, Erwin (Apr 6, 2016). "What If the Supreme Court Were Liberal?". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on December twenty, 2016. Retrieved Dec sixteen, 2016.
  7. ^ a b c Bravin, Jess (Jan 3, 2017). "President Obama's Supreme Court Nomination of Merrick Garland Expires". Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on March 10, 2017. Retrieved October iii, 2020.
  8. ^ a b c d e McMillion, Barry J.; Rutkus, Denis Steven (July 6, 2018). "Supreme Court Nominations, 1789 to 2017: Actions by the Senate, the Judiciary Committee, and the President" (PDF). CRS Study (RL33225). Washington, D.C.: Congressional Inquiry Service. Archived (PDF) from the original on Baronial nine, 2019. Retrieved June 17, 2019.
  9. ^ Calfas, Jennifer (January 31, 2017). "Merkley vows to fight Trump's nominee to fill 'stolen' Supreme Court". The Hill. Archived from the original on February 2, 2017. Retrieved February 2, 2017.
  10. ^ Everett, Burgess (October 27, 2016). "Republicans at war over Supreme Courtroom". Politico. Archived from the original on February 3, 2017. Retrieved February 2, 2017.
  11. ^ Rappeport, Alan; Barbarous, Charlie (May 18, 2016). "Donald Trump Releases List of Possible Supreme Courtroom Picks". The New York Times. Archived from the original on July 22, 2016.
  12. ^ Flores, Reena; Garrett, Major (September 23, 2016). "Donald Trump expands list of possible Supreme Courtroom picks". CBS News. Archived from the original on November 30, 2016. Retrieved November 13, 2016.
  13. ^ a b c d e Goldmacher, Shane; Johnson, Eliana; Gerstein, Josh (January 31, 2017). "How Trump got to yes on Gorsuch". Politico. Archived from the original on February ane, 2017. Retrieved February ane, 2017.
  14. ^ Eric Lipton; Jeremy W. Peters (March xix, 2017). "In Gorsuch, Conservative Activist Sees Examination Case for Reshaping the Judiciary". The New York Times. p. A1. Archived from the original on April half dozen, 2017. Retrieved April 8, 2017.
  15. ^ "A bourgeois activist'due south behind-the-scenes campaign to remake the nation'southward courts". Washington Mail. Archived from the original on February xv, 2021. Retrieved October 31, 2020.
  16. ^ Jackson, David (February 1, 2017). "Why Trump chose Neil Gorsuch as his Supreme Court nominee". Us Today. Archived from the original on February ii, 2017. Retrieved Feb 2, 2017.
  17. ^ "Trump chooses Neil Gorsuch, a conservative seen as likely to be confirmed, for Supreme Court". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on January 31, 2017. Retrieved February i, 2017.
  18. ^ Enten, Harry. "How Bourgeois A Supreme Court Nominee Can Trump Go Through The Senate?". FiveThirtyEight. Archived from the original on Jan 31, 2017. Retrieved February 1, 2017.
  19. ^ Konnikova, Maria. "The 4 Rules That Will Explain Neil Gorsuch's Confirmation Fight". Political leader. Archived from the original on February i, 2017. Retrieved February i, 2017.
  20. ^ Primus, Richard (Jan 31, 2017). "Trump Picks Scalia two.0". Politico. Archived from the original on February one, 2017. Retrieved February 2, 2017.
  21. ^ Parlapano, Alicia; Yourish, Karen (Feb 1, 2017). "Where Neil Gorsuch Would Fit on the Supreme Court". The New York Times. Archived from the original on February 2, 2017. Retrieved Feb 2, 2017.
  22. ^ Parker, Ashley; Dawsey, Josh; Barnes, Robert (Dec 18, 2017). "Trump talked most rescinding Gorsuch's nomination". The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on December 19, 2017. Retrieved December 19, 2017.
  23. ^ a b Clauss, Kyle Scott (February 1, 2017). "Neil Gorsuch, Trump'due south Supreme Court Pick, Attended Harvard Law with Obama". Boston. Boston, Massachusetts. Archived from the original on February 2, 2017. Retrieved Feb 3, 2017.
  24. ^ Boyer, Dave (February one, 2017). "Former Obama official endorses Gorsuch nomination for Supreme Court". The Washington Times. Washington, DC. Archived from the original on February ii, 2017. Retrieved February 3, 2017. I have no doubt that if confirmed, Guess Gorsuch would help to restore conviction in the rule of law," Mr. Katyal wrote in a New York Times op-ed. "His years on the demote reveal a delivery to judicial independence — a tape that should requite the American people confidence that he volition non compromise principle to favor the president who appointed him.
  25. ^ "NRA Applauds Neil Gorsuch's Nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court". NRA-ILA. January 31, 2017. Archived from the original on February 4, 2017. Retrieved Feb 3, 2017.
  26. ^ Beckett, Lois (February 1, 2017). "NRA cheers nomination of Neil Gorsuch, seen as gun rights defender". The Guardian. Archived from the original on February 25, 2017. Retrieved February 24, 2017.
  27. ^ "SAF Impressed With Judge Neil Gorsuch For Supreme Court". Yahoo!. Archived from the original on February 25, 2017. Retrieved Feb 24, 2017.
  28. ^ "Opinion - Nancy Pelosi and gun command groups claim that Neil Gorsuch sides with 'felons over gun safety'". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on February three, 2017. Retrieved Feb 3, 2017.
  29. ^ "Statement from Americans for Responsible Solutions and the Constabulary Center to Prevent Gun Violence on Nomination of Judge Neil Gorsuch to Usa Supreme Court". americansforresponsiblesolutions.org. January 31, 2017. Archived from the original on February 25, 2017. Retrieved February 24, 2017.
  30. ^ Carroll, Lauren (February 2, 2017). "Does Neil Gorsuch side with 'felons over gun safety,' as Pelosi says?". PolitiFact. Archived from the original on February four, 2017. Retrieved February iii, 2017.
  31. ^ Center, Claudia (Feb two, 2017). "Supreme Court Nominee Neil Gorsuch Has a Troubling History When Ruling on Disability Rights Cases". ACLU. Archived from the original on Feb 4, 2017. Retrieved February 3, 2017.
  32. ^ Zauzmer, Julie (February i, 2017). "Neil Gorsuch belongs to a notably liberal church — and would exist the showtime Protestant on the Court in years". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on February 4, 2017. Retrieved Feb iv, 2017.
  33. ^ "Gorsuch'due south Night-Money Benefactor Attended His White House Swearing-In Anniversary". Slate. Archived from the original on February 26, 2018. Retrieved February 26, 2018.
  34. ^ Cowan, Richard (February 1, 2017). "Senate Judiciary Democrat says panel should hold hearings for Gorsuch". Reuters. Archived from the original on February 1, 2017. Retrieved February 2, 2017.
  35. ^ Kim, Seung Min (March ix, 2017). "DOJ sends 144,000 pages of Gorsuch documents to Senate". Pol. Archived from the original on March 15, 2017. Retrieved March 14, 2017.
  36. ^ a b "Nomination of the Honorable Neil M. Gorsuch to be an Associate Justice of the Supreme Courtroom of the United states of america". Washington, D.C.: U.s. Senate Committee on the Judiciary. Archived from the original on March 22, 2017. Retrieved March 21, 2017.
  37. ^ a b c Matt Flegenheimer (March 21, 2017). "Gorsuch Tries to Put Himself Above Politics in Confirmation Hearing". The New York Times. p. A20. Archived from the original on March 22, 2017. Retrieved March 23, 2017.
  38. ^ Durbin, Gorsuch spar over Hobby Lobby ruling Archived April xx, 2019, at the Wayback Machine, Washington Mail, Robert Barnes, March 21, 2011. Retrieved April twenty, 2019.
  39. ^ a b c d e Adam Liptak; Matt Flegenheimer (March 22, 2017). "Gorsuch Asserts He Would Be Able To Cadet Trump – Has Made 'No Promises' – Expansive and Evasive in Sometimes Tense Questioning". The New York Times. p. A1. Archived from the original on March 23, 2017. Retrieved March 23, 2017.
  40. ^ Matt Flegenheimer. "Of Horse five. Duck, Mutton Busting and Other Confirmation Diversions". The New York Times. p. A16. Archived from the original on March 23, 2017. Retrieved March 23, 2017.
  41. ^ a b c d Liptak, Adam; Flegenheimer, Matt (March 23, 2017). "Democrats Fail to Motion Gorsuch Off Script and Beyond Generalities". The New York Times. p. A17. Archived from the original on March 23, 2017. Retrieved March 23, 2017.
  42. ^ a b Ford, Matt (March 22, 2017). "Gorsuch: Roe v. Wade Is the 'Law of the Land': At Wednesday's hearing, Democratic senators adopted a new strategy to press the Supreme Court nominee on ballgame and campaign finance". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on June 20, 2019. Retrieved June 20, 2019.
  43. ^ Geidner, Chris (April 4, 2017). "A Short Section In Neil Gorsuch's 2006 Book Appears To Be Copied From A Law Review Commodity". BuzzFeed. Archived from the original on April 10, 2017. Retrieved April 15, 2017.
  44. ^ Bresnahan, John; Everett, Burgess (April 5, 2017). "Gorsuch'southward writings borrow from other authors: The White House rejects any suggestion of impropriety". Political leader. Archived from the original on April eleven, 2017. Retrieved April 15, 2017.
  45. ^ Blake, Aaron (April 5, 2017). "Neil Gorsuch'south 11th-hour plagiarism scare". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on December three, 2018. Retrieved June 20, 2019.
  46. ^ a b Logan, Bryan (April 4, 2016). "Neil Gorsuch is accused of plagiarism amongst a heated Supreme Court confirmation fight". Business Insider. Archived from the original on April 18, 2017. Retrieved April 15, 2017.
  47. ^ Feldman, Noah (April five, 2017). "Gorsuch'southward Plagiarism Is Worthy of Embarrassment: But the copying found in the gauge'due south book isn't disqualifying for the Supreme Courtroom". Bloomberg. Archived from the original on April 8, 2017. Retrieved Apr fifteen, 2017.
  48. ^ "Judiciary Committee Votes On Recent Supreme Courtroom Nominees". Washington, D.C.: Senate Committee on the Judiciary. Compiled by the Senate Library. Archived from the original on June v, 2019. Retrieved June 20, 2019.
  49. ^ Flegenheimer, Matt (Apr 3, 2017). "Senate Judiciary Committee Approves Gorsuch in Party-Line Vote". The New York Times. Archived from the original on April half-dozen, 2019. Retrieved April 4, 2017.
  50. ^ a b Berenson, Tessa (April 3, 2017). "Senate Judiciary Committee Just Approved Neil Gorsuch's Nomination". Time. Archived from the original on April 3, 2017. Retrieved April 4, 2017.
  51. ^ a b Everett, Burgess; Bresnahan, John; Min Kim, Seung (February 1, 2017). "GOP won't rule out killing the filibuster for Supreme Courtroom pick". Politico. Archived from the original on February two, 2017. Retrieved February 2, 2017.
  52. ^ Jackson, David (Feb ane, 2017). "Trump: Go 'nuclear' and cancel delay on Gorsuch vote if needed". USA Today. Archived from the original on February i, 2017. Retrieved Feb two, 2017.
  53. ^ Wallner, James; Corrigan, Ed (January 23, 2017). "A Rules-Based Strategy for Overcoming Minority Obstruction of a Supreme Court Nomination". Heritage Foundation. Archived from the original on April 1, 2017. Retrieved March 31, 2017.
  54. ^ Davis, Sean (February 7, 2017). "Here's How Republicans Can Confirm Supreme Court Nominees Without The Nuclear Option". The Federalist. Archived from the original on April ane, 2017. Retrieved March 31, 2017.
  55. ^ Matt Flegenheimer; Charlie Savage; Adam Liptak (March 24, 2017). "Democrats Programme to Delay to Thwart Gorsuch Nomination". The New York Times. p. A17. Archived from the original on April 6, 2017. Retrieved April 8, 2017.
  56. ^ "Trump's Supreme Court Nominee Is Going To Face An Angry, Partisan Senate Battle". NPR. March 30, 2016. Archived from the original on February i, 2017. Retrieved Feb 1, 2017.
  57. ^ Shear, Michael D.; Liptak, Adam (January 24, 2017). "A Supreme Court Selection Is Promised. A Political Brawl Is Certain". The New York Times. Archived from the original on January 31, 2017. Retrieved Feb one, 2017.
  58. ^ "Facing a 'Massive Revolt', Senate Democrats Movement to Cake Neil Gorsuch". Vanity Fair. Archived from the original on February 4, 2017. Retrieved February one, 2017.
  59. ^ Killough, Ashley; Barrett, Ted (April 7, 2017). "Senate GOP triggers nuclear option to break Democratic delay on Gorsuch". CNN. Archived from the original on June 29, 2019. Retrieved June 20, 2019.
  60. ^ Rogin, Ali (Apr six, 2017). "Senate approves 'nuclear option,' clears path for Neil Gorsuch Supreme Court nomination vote". ABC News. Archived from the original on August iv, 2019. Retrieved June xx, 2019.
  61. ^ Heitshusen, Valerie (April 14, 2017). "Senate Proceedings Establishing Majority Cloture for Supreme Court Nominations: In Brief" (PDF). Congressional Research Service. Archived (PDF) from the original on February 15, 2021. Retrieved October 18, 2020.
  62. ^ Liptak, Adam; Flegenheimer, Matt (April vii, 2017). "Neil Gorsuch Confirmed past Senate as Supreme Courtroom Justice". The New York Times. Archived from the original on July 10, 2018. Retrieved June i, 2019.
  63. ^ Wolf, Richard; Kelly, Erin (April 7, 2017). "Gorsuch confirmation to have major impact on all three branches of regime". USA Today. Archived from the original on June one, 2019. Retrieved June 1, 2019.
  64. ^ "Scroll Call Vote 115th Congress – 1st Session (vote number 111)". senate.gov. April seven, 2017. Archived from the original on April 29, 2017. Retrieved June 1, 2019.
  65. ^ Wolf, Richard; Jackson, David (April x, 2017). "Neil Gorsuch sworn in as 113th Supreme Court justice". U.s. Today. Archived from the original on June 2, 2019. Retrieved June 1, 2019.
  66. ^ Enten, Harry (Feb one, 2017). "Trump Picks Super Conservative, Super Qualified Neil Gorsuch For The Supreme Courtroom". FiveThirtyEight. Archived from the original on Feb 4, 2017. Retrieved February 1, 2017.

External links [edit]

Announcement of nominee

  • President Trump's Nominee for the Supreme Court Neil K. Gorsuch. The White House
  • President Trump Announces Supreme Courtroom of the United States Nominee on YouTube

Confirmation hearing witness testimony

  • Michael Bennet Archived March 23, 2017, at the Wayback Machine
  • Cory Gardner Archived March 23, 2017, at the Wayback Motorcar
  • Neil Katyal Archived March 23, 2017, at the Wayback Machine
  • Neil Gorsuch Archived March 23, 2017, at the Wayback Machine
  • Nancy Scott Degan Archived March 30, 2017, at the Wayback Car
  • Deanell Reece Tacha Archived March 30, 2017, at the Wayback Machine
  • Leah Bressack Archived March thirty, 2017, at the Wayback Machine
  • Elisa Massimino Archived March 30, 2017, at the Wayback Machine
  • Jameel Jaffer Archived March 30, 2017, at the Wayback Automobile
  • Jeff Perkins Archived March 24, 2017, at the Wayback Machine
  • Guerino Calemine Archived March 30, 2017, at the Wayback Auto
  • Jeff Lamken Archived Oct 29, 2020, at the Wayback Machine
  • Lawrence Solum Archived Oct 29, 2020, at the Wayback Machine
  • Jonathan Turley Archived October 29, 2020, at the Wayback Machine
  • Karen Harned Archived March 30, 2017, at the Wayback Machine
  • Heagther McGhee Archived March thirty, 2017, at the Wayback Machine
  • Fatima Goss Graves Archived March 30, 2017, at the Wayback Machine
  • Patrick Gallagher Archived March 30, 2017, at the Wayback Car
  • Eve Hill Archived March 30, 2017, at the Wayback Auto
  • Peter Kirsanow Archived March 30, 2017, at the Wayback Auto
  • Alice Fisher Archived March xxx, 2017, at the Wayback Motorcar
  • Hannah Smith Archived October 29, 2020, at the Wayback Machine
  • Timothy Meyer Archived October 29, 2020, at the Wayback Automobile
  • Jamil N. Jaffer Archived October 29, 2020, at the Wayback Machine
  • Kristen Clarke Archived March 30, 2017, at the Wayback Machine
  • Sarah Warbelow Archived March xxx, 2017, at the Wayback Machine
  • Amy Hagstrom Miller Archived March 30, 2017, at the Wayback Machine
  • William Marshall Archived March thirty, 2017, at the Wayback Motorcar
  • Sandy Phillips Archived March 30, 2017, at the Wayback Auto

stevensonquited.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_Gorsuch_Supreme_Court_nomination

Talvez você goste destas postagens

Postar um comentário for "Neil Gorsuch Was Recently Appointed to Fill What Federal Position? *"